Green Jobs

Historic Context

From 1973 to 1980, Connecticut had at least ten solar manufacturers providing jobs in system design, manufacturing and installation. The loss of federal funding led to the collapse of these businesses. Connecticut learned a lesson from the demise of this promising industry: sustained and orderly development free of boom and bust funding periods is necessary for creation and maintenance of green jobs in its economy. These jobs, which require skill development, can be an important engine of economic growth. Connecticut has a history of environmental activism and strong environmental regulation. Studies conducted at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) as early as the 1992 demonstrate that states with strong environmental policies excel in economic performance.1

Since the late 1990s, Connecticut has adopted a range of measures and programs to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy, funded by the federal and state governments and utility ratepayers. These efforts have given Connecticut an advantage in developing a green economy. However, we have not taken necessary steps to effectively address related job development. There is no clear definition of a green job. Agencies and educational institutions involved in green job development do not adequately coordinate their efforts. Certifications of skills are not consistent, nor are programs for development of needed skills. There is no single state agency with authority or responsibility for ensuring Connecticut is maximizing federal funding related to green jobs.

The following are steps Connecticut has taken related to energy efficiency and renewable energy:

  • State legislation established ratepayer funded programs for both investor-owned and municipal utility electric conservation programs, administered by those utilities. Natural gas conservation programs have also been funded by ratepayers and coordinated with the electric programs. These programs are part of the Connecticut Energy Efficiency Fund (CEEF) and are overseen and advised by the Energy Conservation Management Board (ECMB). The investor-owned utility program plans are subject to Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC) approval. Federal stimulus funding has allowed these programs to address all fuel conservation measures.
  • State funding has been used for rebate programs for furnace and boiler upgrades and replacements with high efficiency units.
  • Programs utilizing both federal and state funds have been developed to upgrade and replace furnaces and boilers for low-income households.
  • Federal funding has been utilized to support all fuels weatherization for low income households.
  • Energy efficiency requirements have been established for various appliances.
  • Tax and other incentives have been established supporting energy efficiency, and development of renewable technologies and distributed resources. Such resources include small- and medium-size generating facilities, which may include renewable energy facilities. The incentives include capital and operating-cost subsidies and the provision of long-term and low interest financing.
  • Connecticut established a ratepayer supported fund for renewable energy programs (Connecticut Clean Energy Fund or CCEF). The fund is overseen by a 15-member board, which must develop a comprehensive plan that outlines strategies to support renewable energy sources and related enterprises, and to stimulate demand for renewable energy.
  • Investor-owned utilities are required to obtain increasing proportions of their power from renewable resources under the renewable portfolio standard (RPS), created to encourage the development and deployment of renewable energy technologies.
  • Certain large construction projects are required to meet "green building" standards.
  • The state building code has been upgraded regarding energy efficiency.

Connecticut has the opportunity to build on renewed federal interest in creating a more energy efficient and sustainable future, supported by federal stimulus funding through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan of 2009 (ARRA). In 2009, Connecticut received a $3.36 million from the U.S. Department of Labor in ARRA funding to expand green jobs training and education initiatives. Connecticut's funding proposal was developed by the Connecticut Green Jobs Partnership, a public-private labor and education consortium created by Executive Order No. 23. The Office of Workforce Competitiveness, with guidance from the partnership, is responsible for implementing the initiatives in the proposal and strategic plan. Included among the initiatives to be pursued:

  • Ensuring that the education curriculum and training capacity match the needs of energy sector employers;
  • Providing green technology training for municipal building officials; and
  • Upgrading the skills of displaced workers or those whose jobs have been outsourced.

The opportunities related to pursuing green job initiatives include new business and job creation, retraining unemployed and underemployed individuals during the economic downturn, providing opportunities for career advancement in energy efficiency and sustainability, reducing dependence on foreign oil, strengthening national security, promoting the use of domestic renewable energy resources, reducing the taxpayer burdens relating to inefficient public buildings, reducing household and business burdens relating to inefficient homes and buildings, and mitigating environmental impacts and climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Connecticut must maximize federal funds for development of green jobs. We must develop a clear definition of green jobs, with clear standards for certification and licensing that are recognized nationally, as well as in Connecticut. Education and training programs must be designed to develop job skills and create career tracks for an evolving green economy. They must lead to appropriate skill level certifications, including degree programs and licensing. Green jobs need to be defined in a measurable manner to ensure it is possible to track progress on initiatives, and Connecticut must track education, certification and licensing, as well as placement in green jobs.


1 Meyer, Stephen M., Environmentalism and Economic Prosperity, p. iv., MIT, October 1992.

Panel Membership:

Panel members represented government, education, labor, the environmental community and the investor owned electric utilities.

Legislators:
Rep. Vickie Nardello, Chair
Rep. Elizabeth Esty
Rep. Henry Genga
Rep. Susan Johnson
Rep. Matt Lesser
Rep. James O'Rourke
Rep. Lonnie Reed

Connecticut Clean Energy Fund
Lisa Dondy

Workforce Development Boards
Joe Carbone

University of Connecticut
Prabakhar Singh
Dr. Cameron Faustman

Institute for Sustainable Energy
Eastern Connecticut State University
William Leahy

Connecticut Community Colleges
Shelly Jewell

Connecticut Technical Schools
Patricia Ciccone

Grow Jobs Connecticut
John Harrity

Connecticut Trades
Frank DaCato

Environmental Energy Solutions
Joel Gordes

Environment Connecticut
Christopher Phelps

Greater New Haven Clean Cities Coalition
Lee Grannis

Northeast Utilities
James Ferrentino

United Illuminating
Chris Ehlert