Friends,
I wanted to share an update on HB 5362, a housing bill debated in the House that ultimately did not advance in the Senate before adjournment.
I voted against the bill after raising concerns on the House floor about a provision that, in my view, could have unintentionally weakened a municipality’s ability to preserve commercial space in their communities.
At the center of the issue was a subtle but important change in language related to commercially zoned properties. Under current law, towns have flexibility to allow housing while still requiring mixed-use development, helping preserve ground-floor retail, small businesses, and vibrant Main Streets.
That balance matters in communities like Bethel.
As many of you know, we have a limited amount of commercially zoned land in town. Once those spaces are converted entirely to residential use, they are often gone for good. I was concerned the bill’s language could create ambiguity that would make it harder for municipalities to require the commercial components that help sustain local economies and town centers.
I support expanding housing opportunities in Connecticut, and I believe we need thoughtful conversations around affordability and growth. But I also believe local communities should retain the flexibility to shape development in ways that make sense for their character and economic needs.
I appreciated hearing from local officials, residents, and colleagues on this issue, and I was proud to speak up on behalf of the concerns many communities were raising.
As always, thank you for staying engaged. |
|
